Archive > Flight Simulation
Upgrade for sure but wait!
EHM-1703 Philip:
To an extent I would agree with you Phil, but I really think it is too early to speculate about Hardware needs at the moment. As far as software, It will run on XP!
Facts that we actually know about FSX and have been confirmed by MS are:
1) FSX will be released as a 32 bit Application and will run on Windows XP
2) FSX will run on Direct X 9 Compatible Graphics Cards
3) FSX will be updated at a date sometime after release to take advantage of 64 bit OS & Direct X 10.
Yes I am not denying that you will need a fairly decent system but by the time of release specs which are relatively high now will actually be affordable.
Last week I bought a Saphire Radeon X1800XT Crossfire Graphics card for 150 pounds sterling from my local PC supplier. This is a Shader Model 3 card with 256mb Ram and pretty d**n good if I do say so myself. Three months ago this same card was retailing for around 300 pounds. In six months time I expect this card to be selling for between 70 & 80 pounds. At the same time I purchased an Intel Pentium D 940 CPU and an Intel 955 Motherboard, total cost 200 pounds sterling. Again, 3 months ago the same kit would have cost me double that (well with the equivelant 840 CPU) and in 6 months time I expect it to cost almost half again.
I agree with you on one point, don't be scared in to upgrading now. Save your money and wait for the release. You may just find that if you have a fairly good system now that runs FS2004 well with addon scenery such as Active Sky and/or Ground Environment then there is a good possibility it will run FSX just as well without the need for these addons sceneries as they are included out of the box. You can also forget about the Vista version until you are satisfied that Vista is stable.
EHM-1199 Philip:
Phil, I think you are being optimistic in your expectations here. Microsoft themselves say in their product overview ...
"The latest installment will include the usual genre leading realism that continues to awe real pilots and will serve as the graphical benchmark for games on Windows Vista."
Yes, there will be a 32bit version but this will almost certainly not be worth the upgrade ... the whole purpose of everything Microsoft do at the end of the year will be geared to encouraging folk to get Vista. Consequently expect Vista and 64bit FSX to be essential if you want to see the type of performance in the publicity screenshots and videos that Microsoft have released. (Expect to see the same with Office and all other MS applications and games - they will be practically beating us round the head with the need to upgrade.)
Basically the price of an entry level games system just never changes. In 1998 when I got my first PC an entry level games system cost about £1000. For that you got a 4Mb RAM 486DX66MHz system and about a 40Mb harddrive. That was the bees kness for a gaming machine. (Sadly, I went to the maximum my savings would then allow and had the £799 386 SX40 with 4Mb ram.) Able to play the games but not quite up to it for Strike Commander!)
When I bought my current system about two years ago, the same was true. Basically I got a 3.2GHz P4 with 512Mb RAM and a 170Gb harddrive for just under a grand. The same will be true in 12 months time ... an acceptable gaming system will cost about a grand and no doubt will be sufficient for Vista and a reasonable look at FSX. To look really hot folks will need SLI configurations for video cards and an extra 500 notes or so to really kick the system in to gaming heaven.
As regard scenery, I see Active Sky as a utility more than a scenery upgrade and as such I wouldn't be sure whether to put it on the primary harddrive or the secondary. I would guess the primary. For such as the VFR photo scenery or the detailed airport scenery we see now, a second hard drive will be needed and FSX will not deliver to this level - folks are still going to need addon products for this.
EHM-1703 Philip:
Sorry Phil I can see that only time will prove who is right on this subject and I guess we will have to agree to disagree and I really don't want to turn this in to the preverbial Pi**ing contest! (This is my last post on this subject until I have further concrete information! :P)
I would certainly Disagree that in 1998 a entry level games sytem would buy you a 486 DX66. By 1998 a £1,000 would buy you a system with a Pentium 2 inside. (Edit, I know I bought an Evesham P2 in 1998 which came in at £998)
I do agree that Running the game on Vista with a Dual Core Processor and a Direct X 10 Graphics card will reap the best results. I disagree that this will be "necessary" to play the game or get any benefit over FS2004 though. No Developer in their right mind, including Microsoft, would develop or sell a product that will only benefit a high end system, this is just not good business sense. (we both know that every game that has ever been released commercially is specifically aimed at the largest sales market which is Mid Range)
I don't know whether you aware that as of a month ago there was not even a peice of Direct X 10 compatible hardware in the prototype stage? Microsoft had not yet tested FSX on a DX10 machine, simply because one did not exist at this point in time! (I don't know whether this is still true but I have not read anything to the contrary)
Put simply, I can't and wont believe that it will be necessary to have the best gaming system available on the day of launch to run the game, they are the largest Software comapany in the world, they didn't get that way by selling to a market that does not exist.
I will end by saying I will have my copy of FSX on Pre Order purely because I am more than willing to Support the company that has developed and updated a quality peice of software which I have gained great pleasure from for almost the last 25 years. :)
EHM-1671 Ben:
I'm getting scared...
Being only 15, I'm not quite sure that I'll be able to afford to upgrade my system. Of course, I'll be doing quite a bit of uninstalling but that goes without saying.
Then there are the delays; it takes about 6 months (no joke) for software/movies to reach New Zealand, and maybe a little less for Microsoft Vista to get here. So I'll be forced to have a look, see how everyone rates FSX, and what it's like. I doubt very much that I'll be updating my computer to Microsoft Vista any time in the near future though.
For those of you who are getting it ASAP (I faintly remember someone saying they even pre-ordered it) then you are unofficially obliged to take dozens of screenshots, and let us all know how it goes! ;D
EHM-1199 Philip:
I guess we all need a little patience ... there is at least another six months to wait and that is if the product arrives on time :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version