Archive > EuroHarmony Main Forum

Online Training

<< < (5/5)

EHM-1883 Matt:
I have no problem with anything like that. I will take the test once we have agreed on something

One thing I don't get is that earlier, Bruno said that he asked me to stop training in topics, he's used U2, and other ways, but I have not recieved U2's, I have not seen these posts, and Javier told me that Murray gave me permission to train, so I wasn't trying to do something without permission, I thought I had permission, so I'm sorry if I went against the rules in anyway, but I was told what I was doing is fine, so I hadn't a clue what was going on.

And, no offence taken, for all those people saying all due respect. I understand completely what you are trying to say.

On this matter, I was thinking how about we have teachers for different departments, so we can have one doing Phraseology, and one doing Glidescope patterns, and one doing radios etc. and there'd be tests for the department you'd want to teach in, for example, I'd like to teach Phraseology, while Javier might want to teach basic skills.

I ope you like my idea.

EHM-1703 Philip:
Well nice to see a healthy debate taking place, this must be the busiest day in the forums for some time!!!

Seeing as everyone else is getting in on the act, I think I will add my opinion.

IMHO there is nothing wrong with one member training another so long as that person is either qualified or is "CERTAIN" that they are training the correct procedures. Lets face it, if I was to perform a training session and everything I told you was wrong, what impression would you get of our VA?

I think the forums are used on a daily basis to offer help and advice, and this is encouraged by the MT. We do however request that you don't advertise something that is not sanctioned by the company or that is currently available from the company for the benefit of the membership. It is a bit of a slap in the face for us when members start going above us to arrange their own training sessions when they are offered and monitored by the MT.  I refer to comments such as this:


--- Quote --- I think you should have an online lesson, since you seem to be struggling quite alot with IVAO
--- End quote ---


Four posts down the page:

--- Quote ---Haha, I'm still learning myself so I don't know a lot about it. However, xxxx, like xxxx said, if you're keen to come and have a few IVAO lessons with xxxx, xxxx and I then you're more than welcome!! ;)
--- End quote ---


The next post:

--- Quote --- The next lesson will be about phraseology, so, I don't know whta you're like when it comes to that, so If you want to come along, it's sunday at 08:00z
--- End quote ---


Now don't get me wrong, nobodies intentions are in question, it is the way these members took it upon themselves to act on behalf of the VA and the management by advertising an "online training session" in the companies forums without first requesting training or permission from the MT?

Lastly I would just like to say that I feel that this is also been blown out of proportion somewhat. It is my understanding that Bruno requested that these discussions did not happen, then when they continued, he made the company position clear. If these people want to continue their training, they are more than welcome to do so, all we have asked that it is arranged in such a way that it is not advertised in our forums and that they use a callsign that is not associated with the company. I personally don't see what the problem is with that.

EHM-1883 Matt:
here here Phil!

I won't use the forums, as I know I did 2 of those posts, so I'm really sorry about this whole matter. This is mainly all my fault, and I am really sorry. I'm sorry if ever since I've joined, I've been a bit of an idiot in some way.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page