Archive > ProPilot Main Forum
New FAC algorithm to enter as soon as possible.
EHM-0361 Karsten:
--- Quote ---Originally posted by EHM-1883 Matt
I like all of it, except the fact that you get extra if it's on a network. I think that is very unfair considering alot of us don't like to fly online.
--- End quote ---
I think I prefer this, instead of what I have seen other places where online flying where rewarded double flight time
EHM-1442 Luis:
I think the new algorithm 'll be more fair and if possible it must include another variable, that is the difficulty of the airplane, as we know is different make a ProPilot flight on a Beech or on a 747, or on any payware like LevelD or PMDG.
The aircrafts must have a difficulty rate that must be included in the FAC algorithm.:>:% :]
How much worse, better........ehehehehe....heheheh......
Just a question - 'll be a convertion from the current FAC or everybody starts from the beginning?
This is just my opinion
EHM-1714 João:
--- Quote ---Originally posted by EHM-1442 Luis
Ias we know is different make a ProPilot flight on a Beech or on a 747, or on any payware like LevelD or PMDG.
--- End quote ---
;DSure! Flying a Beech is much harder and a lot more fun!;D
EHM-1947 Miko:
Why reward long flights ? I think the difficulties and the art of flying is revealed at departure and approach. Why reward the autopilot?
I agree to honour the online pilots because they are not allways responsible for certain things especially descent rate and speed at approach - and last but not least - they have more things to do as only concentrating on fault avoidance.
But it is very difficult and the different oppinions show that. So I think Brunos new formula is quit allright.
EHM-1442 Luis:
--- Quote ---
;DSure! Flying a Beech is much harder and a lot more fun!;D
--- End quote ---
Yes,you are right and that must be the reason why everybody here starts flying 747 and when we are ATP we are allowed to fly a Beech.......:> hmm... very logical:]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version