Archive > Monthly Fly-in Announcements and Discussions

May Fly-in - Birthday Mega-Event!!!

<< < (5/6) > >>

EHM-1651 Christian:
Here is flighplans with current NAT track Golf. It's a little different from the published route in the Online pages.

Here is a link to the flightplans: Flightplnas with NAT G

Flightplans are for FSNav and FS2004, and valid from 1130z to 1900z May 26th

Happy flying;)

EHM-0654 Murray:
"Official" start for leg two (EGLL=>KATL) is 1300Z, but that's only a guideline to allow Bruno to land and have a short rest ;) (Jav & Matt were preparing to leave for KATL as I was landing at EGLL for instance...)

Regarding routing, go with Christian's above rather than any previously "advertised" (haven't check Christian's yet, but RouteFinder gave me:

EGLL SID CPT UL9 MALOT NATE YYT J575 BOS J16 ALB J190 SFK04 J59 PSB J78 HVQ STAR KATL

mere moments ago - notice it's using NAT E...)

EHM-0948 Bruno:
Hi guys,

I saw the NAT tracks and I think the most suitable is the "E" one:

E MALOT 53/20 52/30 50/40 48/50 NOVEP YYT


So, the route will be:

EGLL SID CPT UL9 MALOT 53N020W 52N030W 50N040W 48N050W NOVEP YYT J575 BOS J16 ALB J190 SFK04 J59 PSB J78 HVQ STAR KATL

SID: CPT3F

I'm already programming the PMDG FMC ;) at gate 608 on EGLL, on my Boeing 747-400F :)

EHM-1612 Paolo:
Hi Guys, I am going to join you all flying from KJFK to KATL. See you soon! ;)

EHM-1651 Christian:

--- Quote ---Originally posted by EHM-0654 Murray
"Official" start for leg two (EGLL=>KATL) is 1300Z, but that's only a guideline to allow Bruno to land and have a short rest ;) (Jav & Matt were preparing to leave for KATL as I was landing at EGLL for instance...)

Regarding routing, go with Christian's above rather than any previously "advertised" (haven't check Christian's yet, but RouteFinder gave me:

EGLL SID CPT UL9 MALOT NATE YYT J575 BOS J16 ALB J190 SFK04 J59 PSB J78 HVQ STAR KATL

mere moments ago - notice it's using NAT E...)
--- End quote ---


Arrg screwed up here:{

Well the ones using NAT G get's a more south routing than those using NAT E....

Sorry guys

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page