Archive > EuroHarmony Main Forum

Bruno\'s Request on changes

<< < (2/3) > >>

EHM-0948 Bruno:
I will take that in mind Dan ... wise opinion. But, if we want to improve, change is needed.

We are thinking about a big plan that we already decided to move forward. And it will change the way you look at our VA. I know that some VA's went down the drain when doing such changes, but we promise you that we will always have in mind the main objective of EHM: Fun!.

Also, when the time comes, all of you will be consulted about our ideas and thoughts, so when we started it, all pilots will be envolved on giving some feedback about our strategic ideas.

Regards,

EHM-2360 Lee:
ive only just started flying with ehm recently but i love it i would maybe suggest a definate lean for fsx as well as fs9 as i know alot of people have fsx and there is definately demand for it so why not  try and plug that gap and be better than we already are  cheers

EHM-2272 Callum:
I think that maybe to progress like other virtual airlines our livery should maybe be futurised a bit, although that would be hard to implement on every aircraft so that would probably be a no no.

The website is very nice but at times feels a little bit crowded as there is so much information and it sometimes gets too hard to interact with so maybe a slight tidy up?

Just my two cents, apart from that though, EHM is looking fine to me ;)

EHM-2288 Glenn:
1. Do you think the ProPilot system could be implemented on all the VA and we could diminish to "zero" the offline flights, but only if the Flight Logger could work decently by saving PP flights to send later ?
Yes

2. Do you think the ProPilot system should be upgraded to:
a) Economical factors like start having money transactions;
Yes, that would have been really great

b) New features like failures, more navigational information to configure and more decent FAC;
I'm just thinking about the pilots which fly online, and if you implent even more failures, it can be difficult for online pilots, when ATC commands us to do something else.

c) What more features you would like to see on ProPilot?
Would like to see ProPilot compatible to start up from a remote PC through WideFS/FSUIPC


3. Make the route schedule complete. Ex. when the tours ends at an airport. There is no possible flights out of this airport. Very important for pilots like me, who like to fly from A to B, and continue from B to C.

4. I'm in love of statistics. And think that maybe you can take it all out. Implent everything that we are logging in Flight Logger, such as how we land Visual/ILS, landing touchdown, and so on. But I don't like the new menu system, the old one was much better, it's difficult to manage through the sides with this new menu layout

5. I'm a big Short 360 fan, but this new aircraft is not working like a real Short 360. You can't take off this aircraft, only with the use of trim. Please fix the aircraft back to the way it was. I know that Short 360 don't have that big engines, but it has the possibility to takeoff without the use of trim.

6. It's not important to me, but maybe for other pilots

EHM-0948 Bruno:
Hi mates,

The idea that we want your feedback for point 1, is about the following approach:

All flights except the tours and fly-ins are made using the Flight Logger. This means that we will need to improve the flight logger in order to have offline (not-internet-connected-flying!) flights.

The Dynamic Flight Timetable (locking airplanes and moving airplanes to airports) will be used except for the contexts described on the previous point, but there will be a possibility that the pilot can choose if he wants to fly as ProPilot or only as DFT.

So, practically we will have the following options:

If you are flying a normal flight,  not being a Tour or Fly-In:

1. You select your flight;
2. After you select your flight, the system will ask you if you want to use the ProPilot system or not;
3. If you say "yes", it will be a ProPilot + DFT flight;
4. If you say "no" it will be only a DFT flight (no FAC).

If the flight is a Tour or Fly-In than these situations don't appear.

Feedback please :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page