I noticed this phenomenon too at some airports.
I think that FS data include some standard procedures that (closely or loosely) match real ones, but for some airports only. For other airports, AI vectoring seem to follow a VERY basic pattern, completely unrelated to the surrounding terrain.
This is why AI approach seems to do a good job in some places (it happened to me in Quito, on a Eurobusiness mission, and poor visibility) and a very lousy one in other places (worst experience I had was in Tarbes, on an ex-Euroholidays mission).
And it is not only approach which is hit, the same applies for departure (possibly worse, as I never noticed anything like a SID). Once I took off in Juneau, Alaska with an IFR plan heading north, and quickly was instructed by AI ATC to turn left right into a mountainside "then resume own navigation".
Thus I generally expect the worse when being vectored by AI ATC over difficult terrain, always ready to cancel IFR and find my own way down.
Also, in order to follow real world procedures, I often cancel IFR once airborne, fly by my own plan and standard procedures, and eventually contact tower on finals only to be cleared for straight-in approach (provided I get or guess the active runways correctly).
Andrei