EuroHarmony Community Forums

Archive => EuroHarmony VA => Old Forum => Ask EuroHarmony => Topic started by: EHM-1343 Jonathan on September 28, 2004, 08:16:57 pm

Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1343 Jonathan on September 28, 2004, 08:16:57 pm: Hello.

I am back after an absence. My computer had a few viruses on it so we rebooted it and started from scratch. So when i got back online i had to catch up with the fs world. I soon stumbled across a 767 300er made by IFDG. it is absolutley brilliant. it puts the POSKY version to shame. it has loads of detail like opening doors and apparently, the fight dynamics are more realistic. What are the chances of getting the 767 fleet upraged form POSKY to IFDG

Cheers
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1001 Robert on September 28, 2004, 10:30:37 pm: Chances are good ;) it is only a matter of time. ;D
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1343 Jonathan on September 29, 2004, 08:13:56 am: Quality!
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-0695 Scott on September 29, 2004, 09:39:16 am: I disagree.. The POSky dynamics were much better suited for weight and balance. Granted the fuel consumption performance needed adjustment I find the POSky 767 a better model.

As for detail, I never cared much for a virtual *cabin* or opening cabin doors. I am usually too busy flying to stare at a plane on the ground. It's neat but, I think VA aircraft should stick to a balance between performance and eye candy.
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-0962 Zhen Yi on September 30, 2004, 11:07:06 am: Appears that the POSKY one would perform better on slower computers like mine so i guess it would be more beneficial to keep the POSKY one for a little longer
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1343 Jonathan on October 05, 2004, 05:49:54 pm: How about we have both, just put them under different links
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-0361 Karsten on October 05, 2004, 07:50:17 pm: I'm not sure our repainters like idea of having to do the same job twice. If I know IFDG and POSKY you have to do two repaints because the texture for the two models are different from each other.
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1343 Jonathan on October 05, 2004, 07:53:02 pm: Oh, i thought that it would be real simple, but i was wrong so it dosen't matter.

You gotta say that it was worth a try
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1358 Tim on October 10, 2004, 11:04:04 am: We need the Meljet 777 the latest version. Its so rocks. Ive got a few payware a/c aswel such as the PMDG B1900D that just so rocks and i got Active Camera aswel that is very good.
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1001 Robert on October 10, 2004, 11:25:36 am: We have the "latest" 777 from Meljet. We have V1 of the model now, while V2 have only a better virtual cabin and nothing more. Probably we will switch to V3 when it comes out, but currently stay with V1 as it is more framerate friendly.

Also there will be some repaints for the commercial products, like the PMDG B1900, or B738 in the future.
Title: 767 300er
Post by: EHM-1001 Robert on November 27, 2004, 11:07:07 pm: I red a very long conversation on the IFDG forum about their B767. They mentioned many bugs about the plane: texture misalignements, texture mixing, and a quite bad dynamic model. IFDG was apologizing, but they said, they cannot improve the plane as the designer is now at POSKY, and they do not bother with renewing old models.

If you feel the POSKY model is not enough realistic, it is probably because the FDE is not the latest. I am planning to renew the 767 in texture and FDE, so changes can be expected. ;)